Summary
I found this thesis is very relevant to what I want to do in my dissertation study. This paper basically considers to fill up the gap between human and machine collaboration, based on the approach of interactive and interpretable models. More specifically, this thesis develops a framework of "human-in-the-loop machine learning" system. There are three parts to consist this paper: 1) build up a generative model for re-produce human decision process. This section is aimed to extract the relevant information from a natural human decision process, to prove the machine learning can effectively predict the humans' sequential plan; 2) a case-based reasoning and prototype classification. This section is aimed to provide a meaningful explanation to user to better engage with the system. The goal of this part is to examine the
Although the thesis structure is very similar to what I want to do. However, the author focus on more in the Bayesian decision support model. All the findings and systems are based on the model. Say, how a rescue team to form up a resource allocation plan, within a sequential decision step? How the domain expert can contribute their knowledge into the model to generate a better result (model accuracy)? How the graphical interface can help user to input their feedback and get a better model result? But in my expertise, we should think about this issue in a different perspective: recommender system.
If I follow the same three layer structure, the whole idea would be: First, interaction patterns, to understand the human behavior to the machine, e.g. The recommender system with a complex machine learning or data mining techniques. I need to know how human interaction with the system and how the system can help them better fulfill the task they care about. More specifically, to test how the
No comments:
Post a Comment